The consequences of violations are not at all clear and depend on many factors. Often it’s by companies large enough to think they can get away with it, or simply don’t understand what’s required of them, even if it may only be a use acknowledgement or a GitHub page documenting how they changed the code. This has produced a rich environment of collaboration between people volunteering their time and companies whose engineers are essentially being paid to contribute.īut such licenses are frequently not respected. This sort of license is common in open source software, which is provided free of charge even in many cases to large corporations, which are free to use and modify it - as long as they do so publicly and make their work part of the overall development of the tool. No mention of Mastodon was made by Truth, although it’s plain that the company’s code is being used.
#Autoturn network license release software
“Mastodon is free software published under the AGPLv3 license, which requires any over-the-network service using it to make its source code and any modifications to it publicly accessible.” “The terms of service included a worrying passage, claiming that the site is proprietary property and all source code and software are owned or controlled by them or licensed to them,” he wrote. People inspecting the code of the pre-launch site last week found it was very clearly using Mastodon’s code without acknowledgment. In a post to the Mastodon blog, founder and CEO Eugen Rochko explained that the problem is not simply that Truth Social uses Mastodon, but that it does so while claiming ownership over the site’s code. If it doesn’t fix things by the end of next month, things could get messy. Mastodon, a free social media framework, alleges that Truth Social is passing open source software off as its own, and has given them 30 days to fix this. Former President Trump’s new social network might be in hot water before it even launches.